Forum dedicated to collectors of animal toy replicas
 
Toy animal WikiToy animal Wiki  HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  Dictionary  Animal Toy forum  
Very Happy The topic "Animals where you live" won the SUY for December" Very Happy

Share | 
 

 Smilodon figurine accuracy

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3
AuthorMessage
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:21 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
I found the ML too big--it was about the size of the rhino! As well, on a shelf, it looked weird, just because it was as large or larger than most of the mammoth figures!

As a Smilodon, it looked okay. better than the original Carnegie (keeping in mind, my version of that was from the original 1988 run, which was...not a great casting).



I agree the original casting of the Carnegie Sabertooth was in a lot of ways crude, especially its saber teeth (they were terrible).  When I state this figure was good, I am only referring to its body morphology / build.  There are numerous more current Smilodonts that have more crisp detail
and improved aesthetics, but most all of those are also very wrong in morphology and scientific accuracy.
The Carnegie & Missing link figures have very good scientific accuracy.


Last edited by smilodoncalifornicus on Fri Aug 21, 2015 8:09 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Thu Aug 20, 2015 10:20 pm

Paleontologist Julie Meachen-Samuels of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham talking about Smilodon's forelimbs:
“I found that they had exceptionally thick humerus cortical bones—much thicker than any non-saber-toothed cat living or extinct,” said Meachen-Samuels, who used a digital X-ray machine to analyze the limb bones of Smilodon specimens from California’s La Brea Tar Pits in 2010. “I hypothesized that this extreme cortical thickening was correlated with the extremely long sabers. The robust limbs allowed Smilodon to restrain its prey so that it would be able to make a killing bite without damage to its saber teeth.”

The above findings by this Paleontologist are the complete opposite of how almost ALL Smilodon figurines are sculpted.  Most Smilodon figurines are sculpted with very average or even slender forelimbs that are way to long and with more modern cat shaped frontal extremities.   The Carnegie Smilodon however, is sculpted like what the above Paleontologist has described.
Back to top Go down
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Wed Jan 13, 2016 3:21 pm

This is the Safari Carnegie Smilodon from my collection.  I have changed its saber teeth, as the original
ones were poorly sculpted. To myself, this figure has the most scientifically accurate body for a Smilodon.
I think this figure most accurately portrays what paleontologists describe when talking about this cat.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


Last edited by smilodoncalifornicus on Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:51 am; edited 4 times in total
Back to top Go down
Wilorvise



Country/State : Michigan, USA
Age : 32
Joined : 2014-08-24
Posts : 2036

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Wed Jan 13, 2016 3:23 pm

Cool :)

_________________
Laura
Back to top Go down
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Thu Jan 14, 2016 10:16 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Cool :)

Much appreciated.
Back to top Go down
Roger
Admin


Country/State : Portugal
Joined : 2010-08-20
Posts : 20238

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jan 15, 2016 1:28 am

Great work with these teeth. Even if their shape is well known, for many reasons, manufacturers insist in making them wrong. I also like the robuste looking of that figure. Very Happy

_________________
~ Rogério [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jan 15, 2016 4:35 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Great work with these teeth. Even if their shape is well known, for many reasons, manufacturers insist in making them wrong. I also like the robuste looking of that figure. Very Happy

Thank you Roger.  I agree with you about the manufacturers sculpting them wrong. I think most of the time, mainstream toy companies get Smilodon's morphology completely wrong.


Last edited by smilodoncalifornicus on Fri Apr 08, 2016 4:15 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
Kikimalou
Admin


Country/State : Lille, FRANCE
Age : 52
Joined : 2010-04-01
Posts : 15194

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jan 15, 2016 6:51 am

I' m sorry I paste my post about CollectA smilodon here because I'm too lazy to write it a second time  Laughing
It is obvious I agree with Sbell, i think M. Anton reconstruction are more realistic and accurate.
A robust forelimb able to restrain a prey must look like a Greco-Roman wrestler musculature, not like a weightlifter or bodybuilder one. Even if it is not a sprinter, a smilodon isn't a static animal.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
I respectfully do not agree about the Mojo figure.  I don't think its too stocky.  I don't even think its stocky enough in certain areas.  The Mojo cats limbs are too long according to fossils and its forelimbs still not built thick enough.  The CollectA figure's forelimbs are MUCH to long and much to slender for a Smilodon.  Look at this:

Paleontologist Julie Meachen-Samuels of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham talking about Smilodon's forelimbs:
“I found that they had exceptionally thick humerus cortical bones—much thicker than any non-saber-toothed cat living or extinct,” said Meachen-Samuels, who used a digital X-ray machine to analyze the limb bones of Smilodon specimens from California’s La Brea Tar Pits in 2010.

The CollectA Smilodon to me is not true to skeletons according to this Paleontologist's findings.
There is nothing stocky about the CollectA's forelimbs on that figurine...they are very slender and long, more like a modern extant cats are.

I believe just about 95% of all Smilodon figurines made, are not scientifically accurate at all.

I understand your point but I'm not convinced. Talking about bones and talking about muscles is not the same thing.

Human beings are human beings, same skeletal but with big differences in muscles and shapes.

Some are looking like thin people without big muscles, some with very big muscles, some with more fat than muscles, some...

A marathon runner has a different body than a sprinter.
A weightlifter has a different body than a Body-builder.
A boxer has a different body than a Greco-Roman wrestler.

A Body-builder has a different body than a Greco-Roman wrestler. The body-builder has big static musculature and the Greco-Roman wrestler has a dynamic musculature. The shape is completely different.

IMHO a smilodon isn't a body-builder, no animal can have a body-builder musculature. A smilodon is not hunting like a sprinter or a weightlifter, it was an animal who needed to ambush preys and firmly hold them in place for the killing. The best analogy for me is the Greco-Roman wrestler. Greco-Roman wrestler have a dynamic musculature, powerful but not inflated like body-builder one.

Paleontologist Julie Meachen-Samuels is talking about exceptionally thick humerus cortical bones, not about stocky forelimbs. A thick humerus cortical bones means that smilodon had powerful muscles, not necessarily stocky. Elephants have thick bones, it doesn't mean they have Schwarzenegger body shape.

The other constant reference is the bear like shape. Let's talk about brown bears, grizzlies or polar bears: Powerful animals, hunters, with big bones, very strong forelimbs AND thick fur.

Remove the thick fur and change for a lion fur, far less thick (exept for the mane  Laughing ), bears haven't a body-builder body, they have a dynamic musculature, very powerful but not stocky.

Carnegie or Mojo smilodon are looking as stocky has a polar bear with thick fur but they have short smooth coat. Each time I look at them I think there is something weird.

The CollectA is maybe not perfect but the forelimbs are more powerful than those of the CollectA lion for example. I prefer this one to the Carnegie and even more to the Mojo. Even if my favorite is still the Kaiyodo one  Wink

_________________
Christophe
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jan 15, 2016 7:28 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
I' m sorry I paste my post about CollectA smilodon here because I'm too lazy to write it a second time  Laughing
It is obvious I agree with Sbell, i think M. Anton reconstruction are more realistic and accurate.
A robust forelimb able to restrain a prey must look like a Greco-Roman wrestler musculature, not like a weightlifter or bodybuilder one. Even if it is not a sprinter, a smilodon isn't a static animal.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
I respectfully do not agree about the Mojo figure.  I don't think its too stocky.  I don't even think its stocky enough in certain areas.  The Mojo cats limbs are too long according to fossils and its forelimbs still not built thick enough.  The CollectA figure's forelimbs are MUCH to long and much to slender for a Smilodon.  Look at this:

Paleontologist Julie Meachen-Samuels of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham talking about Smilodon's forelimbs:
“I found that they had exceptionally thick humerus cortical bones—much thicker than any non-saber-toothed cat living or extinct,” said Meachen-Samuels, who used a digital X-ray machine to analyze the limb bones of Smilodon specimens from California’s La Brea Tar Pits in 2010.

The CollectA Smilodon to me is not true to skeletons according to this Paleontologist's findings.
There is nothing stocky about the CollectA's forelimbs on that figurine...they are very slender and long, more like a modern extant cats are.

I believe just about 95% of all Smilodon figurines made, are not scientifically accurate at all.

I understand your point but I'm not convinced. Talking about bones and talking about muscles is not the same thing.

Human beings are human beings, same skeletal but with big differences in muscles and shapes.

Some are looking like thin people without big muscles, some with very big muscles, some with more fat than muscles, some...

A marathon runner has a different body than a sprinter.
A weightlifter has a different body than a Body-builder.
A boxer has a different body than a Greco-Roman wrestler.

A Body-builder has a different body than a Greco-Roman wrestler. The body-builder has big static musculature and the Greco-Roman wrestler has a dynamic musculature. The shape is completely different.

IMHO a smilodon isn't a body-builder, no animal can have a body-builder musculature. A smilodon is not hunting like a sprinter or a weightlifter, it was an animal who needed to ambush preys and firmly hold them in place for the killing. The best analogy for me is the Greco-Roman wrestler. Greco-Roman wrestler have a dynamic musculature, powerful but not inflated like body-builder one.

Paleontologist Julie Meachen-Samuels is talking about exceptionally thick humerus cortical bones, not about stocky forelimbs. A thick humerus cortical bones means that smilodon had powerful muscles, not necessarily stocky. Elephants have thick bones, it doesn't mean they have Schwarzenegger body shape.

The other constant reference is the bear like shape. Let's talk about brown bears, grizzlies or polar bears: Powerful animals, hunters, with big bones, very strong forelimbs AND thick fur.

Remove the thick fur and change for a lion fur, far less thick (exept for the mane  Laughing ), bears haven't a body-builder body, they have a dynamic musculature, very powerful but not stocky.

Carnegie or Mojo smilodon are looking as stocky has a polar bear with thick fur but they have short smooth coat. Each time I look at them I think there is something weird.

The CollectA is maybe not perfect but the forelimbs are more powerful than those of the CollectA lion for example. I prefer this one to the Carnegie and even more to the Mojo. Even if my favorite is still the Kaiyodo one  Wink
Hi Christophe
We just have different views on what Smilodon may have looked like, and that's ok. You make 
some valid points, but I believe in real life Smilodon was a very stocky built cat, especially in its frontal areas.  I do not think this cat was shaped anything like extant big cats. I also think that Smilodon had much more muscle mass and muscle development than modern cats do.  Any Paleontologist's findings I have read overwelmingly agree that Smilodon would have been exceedingly heavier than a large African Lion of the same dimensions. I believe in what they are saying.  This cat was not fleet footed, and was likely a expert in ambush. It's entire method of killing prey, such as wresting a large herbivore to the ground and restraining it all point to a cat that had exceptional muscle development in its frontal regions compared to a modern cat.
Back to top Go down
Kikimalou
Admin


Country/State : Lille, FRANCE
Age : 52
Joined : 2010-04-01
Posts : 15194

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jan 15, 2016 6:39 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

Hi Christophe
We just have different views on what Smilodon may have looked like, and that's ok. You make 
some valid points, but I believe in real life Smilodon was a very stocky built cat, especially in its frontal areas.  I do not think this cat was shaped anything like extant big cats. I also think that Smilodon had much more muscle mass and muscle development than modern cats do.  Any Paleontologist's findings I have read overwelmingly agree that Smilodon would have been exceedingly heavier than a large African Lion of the same dimensions. I believe in what they are saying.  This cat was not fleet footed, and was likely a expert in ambush. It's entire method of killing prey, such as wresting a large herbivore to the ground and restraining it all point to a cat that had exceptional muscle development in its frontal regions compared to a modern cat.

Yes, we just have different views on what Smilodon may have looked like, and that's ok for me too. I like to read your posts and I totally agree with this one. Sometimes we just don't have the same picture behind the same word.

At least I think we will agree about this one Very Happy

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

_________________
Christophe
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
sbell



Country/State : Canada
Age : 41
Joined : 2013-11-06
Posts : 821

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jan 15, 2016 7:15 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

Hi Christophe
We just have different views on what Smilodon may have looked like, and that's ok. You make 
some valid points, but I believe in real life Smilodon was a very stocky built cat, especially in its frontal areas.  I do not think this cat was shaped anything like extant big cats. I also think that Smilodon had much more muscle mass and muscle development than modern cats do.  Any Paleontologist's findings I have read overwelmingly agree that Smilodon would have been exceedingly heavier than a large African Lion of the same dimensions. I believe in what they are saying.  This cat was not fleet footed, and was likely a expert in ambush. It's entire method of killing prey, such as wresting a large herbivore to the ground and restraining it all point to a cat that had exceptional muscle development in its frontal regions compared to a modern cat.

Yes, we just have different views on what Smilodon may have looked like, and that's ok for me too. I like to read your posts and I totally agree with this one. Sometimes we just don't have the same picture behind the same word.

At least I think we will agree about this one Very Happy

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Who is that one from!? Shocked It's amazing!

_________________
Looking for animal figures? I have an actual online store, out of Canada! [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I'm also a big freshwater fish-figure fan. Know of anything new and exciting? I need to know as well!
Back to top Go down
http://faunafigures.com/
Kikimalou
Admin


Country/State : Lille, FRANCE
Age : 52
Joined : 2010-04-01
Posts : 15194

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jan 15, 2016 8:32 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Who is that one from!? Shocked It's amazing!

You can find it [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] cheers

_________________
Christophe
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:42 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

Hi Christophe
We just have different views on what Smilodon may have looked like, and that's ok. You make 
some valid points, but I believe in real life Smilodon was a very stocky built cat, especially in its frontal areas.  I do not think this cat was shaped anything like extant big cats. I also think that Smilodon had much more muscle mass and muscle development than modern cats do.  Any Paleontologist's findings I have read overwelmingly agree that Smilodon would have been exceedingly heavier than a large African Lion of the same dimensions. I believe in what they are saying.  This cat was not fleet footed, and was likely a expert in ambush. It's entire method of killing prey, such as wresting a large herbivore to the ground and restraining it all point to a cat that had exceptional muscle development in its frontal regions compared to a modern cat.

Yes, we just have different views on what Smilodon may have looked like, and that's ok for me too. I like to read your posts and I totally agree with this one. Sometimes we just don't have the same picture behind the same word.

At least I think we will agree about this one Very Happy

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Yes, that one we are in agreement with.  She did a beautiful job overall on that Smilodon
Back to top Go down
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Thu Jun 30, 2016 10:38 pm

Here are a couple more examples of Smilodon figures that I believe are quite decent in scientific accuracy, but not great in aesthetics, painting, or detailing compared to modern figures:

1972 Inpro Smilodon
1989 Imperial Smilodon    ( decent sculpting , although tail is much to long)


The Inpro Smilodon, in fact I think has really good morphology overall.  It's just a very early rendition toy that does not have the artistic detailing or good paint schemes like some of the more current figures.
Back to top Go down
SUSANNE
Admin


Country/State : Denmark, the peninsula of Djursland.
Age : 64
Joined : 2010-09-30
Posts : 28223

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Thu Jun 30, 2016 10:59 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Here are a couple more examples of Smilodon figures that I believe are quite decent in scientific accuracy, but not great in aesthetics, painting, or detailing compared to modern figures:

1972 Inpro Smilodon
1989 Imperial Smilodon    ( decent sculpting , although tail is much to long)


The Inpro Smilodon, in fact I think has really good morphology overall.  It's just a very early rendition toy that does not have the artistic detailing or good paint schemes like some of the  more current figures.

Do you have pictures, please ?? bounce Very Happy

_________________
SUSANNE  [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
http://dyr-og-dimser.dk
sbell



Country/State : Canada
Age : 41
Joined : 2013-11-06
Posts : 821

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jul 01, 2016 1:51 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Here are a couple more examples of Smilodon figures that I believe are quite decent in scientific accuracy, but not great in aesthetics, painting, or detailing compared to modern figures:

1972 Inpro Smilodon
1989 Imperial Smilodon    ( decent sculpting , although tail is much to long)


The Inpro Smilodon, in fact I think has really good morphology overall.  It's just a very early rendition toy that does not have the artistic detailing or good paint schemes like some of the  more current figures.

Do you have pictures, please ?? bounce Very Happy

This is it:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

_________________
Looking for animal figures? I have an actual online store, out of Canada! [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I'm also a big freshwater fish-figure fan. Know of anything new and exciting? I need to know as well!
Back to top Go down
http://faunafigures.com/
SUSANNE
Admin


Country/State : Denmark, the peninsula of Djursland.
Age : 64
Joined : 2010-09-30
Posts : 28223

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jul 01, 2016 12:05 pm

You are right ! I am no expert at all, but this model has the true , almost bear-like appearance Applause

_________________
SUSANNE  [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
http://dyr-og-dimser.dk
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jul 01, 2016 2:46 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Here are a couple more examples of Smilodon figures that I believe are quite decent in scientific accuracy, but not great in aesthetics, painting, or detailing compared to modern figures:

1972 Inpro Smilodon
1989 Imperial Smilodon    ( decent sculpting , although tail is much to long)


The Inpro Smilodon, in fact I think has really good morphology overall.  It's just a very early rendition toy that does not have the artistic detailing or good paint schemes like some of the  more current figures.

Do you have pictures, please ?? bounce Very Happy

This is it:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]



Thank you for posting that picture for me. I am having issues getting pictures posted on this site.
Back to top Go down
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jul 01, 2016 2:50 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
You are right ! I am no expert at all, but this model has the true , almost bear-like appearance Applause

I agree with you Susanne. That Smilodon is not to bad, especially for being a 44 year old figure.
Back to top Go down
Roger
Admin


Country/State : Portugal
Joined : 2010-08-20
Posts : 20238

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Sun Jul 03, 2016 2:39 am

You can also find these and other smilodon figures on TAI.
Just [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] Very Happy

_________________
~ Rogério [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Sun Jul 03, 2016 2:23 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
You can also find these and other smilodon figures on TAI.
Just [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] Very Happy
Thanks Roger
Back to top Go down
Bowhead Whale



Country/State : Canada
Age : 39
Joined : 2012-01-31
Posts : 1012

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Thu Jul 21, 2016 11:03 pm

Where does the Imperial 1989 Smilodon stands in your list?
Back to top Go down
smilodoncalifornicus



Country/State : USA Minnesota
Age : 50
Joined : 2014-09-11
Posts : 149

PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Fri Jul 22, 2016 3:03 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Where does the Imperial 1989 Smilodon stands in your list?


I would say that its better than all the 5 worst list figures, but rated below all the 5 best figures .  This figure would fall somewhere in the middle of the figures I have listed when it comes to scientific accuracy.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Smilodon figurine accuracy   Today at 1:23 am

Back to top Go down
 
Smilodon figurine accuracy
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 3 of 3Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3
 Similar topics
-
» Smilodon figurine accuracy
» Mojo lions, hyena, giraffes, beaver and smilodon... and the Fun started!!!
» Bonsai Figurine workshop
» polystone Seagull figurine
» What is your favourite Safari Ltd animal figurine???

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
STS Forum  :: Animal toy figures reviews and discussions :: General reviews and discussions-
Jump to: