Forum dedicated to collectors of animal toy replicas
 
Toy animal WikiToy animal Wiki  HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  Dictionary  Animal Toy forum  
Very Happy The topic "Animals where you live" won the SUY for December" Very Happy

Share | 
 

 A manufacturers view on scaling

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
AuthorMessage
widukind



Country/State : Germany
Age : 40
Joined : 2010-12-30
Posts : 23568

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Fri Dec 07, 2012 8:03 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
For the scale issue, frankly i do want to try to match scales wherever possible and i will try to the future, hence my trial with 1:30 scale for the Prehistoric range.
Like many of you I feel there is such beauty in a range that has true perspective, it looks so natural.

Captain James Egbert Connoly, I'm sure you will cheers

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
It is a good comparison but if you chose Breyer production technique and scaling it would be a trade off, fine detail and texture or scale?

Not easy i'm afraid scratch study scratch

About the trade off, fine detail and texture or scale? I'm 100% for the texture, detail... and unusual species bounce Laughing
cheers cheers cheers cheers

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Andreas [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Roger
Admin


Country/State : Portugal
Joined : 2010-08-20
Posts : 20232

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Fri Dec 07, 2012 8:23 pm

I love also figures in scale not because of dioramas but mainly because of the educational results of it. Anyway, I understand completely that Mojo and other brands doesn't follow it. You're explaining very well the reasons and we, collectors, are also responsible for it.
I know only some members that defend figures in scale and I know a lot of members that defend them not in scale.
When I find someone saying that CollectA zebra is to large when compared with Schleich zebra it makes me crazy. They are almost the same size only the sculpting is different what makes them with different proportions. Though, zebras in real, have a larger size variation than these 2 figures. It is also disturbing seeing some members, not only the young ones, commenting that Papo hippopotamus is too large. Too large compared with what? Actually it is small when compared with the average sizes of all brand ranges. Why? Because Schleich hippos are incredibly small and because Schleich is the most popular brand, their sizes are accepted as true representations of the sizes of the animals. Is it Schleich fault? No, as long as almost all brands follow the same strategy.But people works better with what is used and History has teached us that when people is used with what is wrong, people will defend it as a religion. Why insist that the Earth orbits around the Sun when everybody sees clearly that it is the Sun that moves in the sky? sunny
So, I don't want Mojo being a victim of the Schleichcentrism once the brand is already a reference in educational aspects, giving us, for example, species like the Iberian lynx and giant sable, adding some information and making efforts to help the Institutions envolved in their preservation. Very Happy
Also, Mojo is a brand that lives only from its animal range and I think the reintorduction of figures in scale is less dangerous to brands that has animal series in a secondary level of importance. Why people asks often Mojo? Because it is the brand that listens to us. :)
However, I'm also glad that you're introducing prehistoric mammals in 1:30 scale, contrary to Christophe I think it is not a huge problem to make a baluchitherium once in volume it is not much larger than a deinotherium. Worse is to make a smilodon apealing in 1:30 scale, something that would result smaller than the Iberian lynx, even worse trying to make some even smaller prehistoric mammals. It goes long! Laughing

_________________
~ Rogério [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


Last edited by Roger on Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:43 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
STORMnl



Country/State : Nijmegen-Netherlands
Age : 56
Joined : 2011-07-24
Posts : 1080

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Fri Dec 07, 2012 10:48 pm

Hello E

Finaly you give youre real name,,Mister master piece creator James

Welcome in our community,good to see you here
and cleared up some scale formality's

Martien

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Kikimalou
Admin


Country/State : Lille, FRANCE
Age : 52
Joined : 2010-04-01
Posts : 15189

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Sat Dec 08, 2012 7:15 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

However, I'm also glad that you're introducing prehistoric mammals in 1:30 scale, contrary to Christophe I think it is not a huge problem to make a baluchitherium once in volume it is not much larger than a deinotherium. Worse is to make a smilodon apealing in 1:30 scale, something that would result smaller than the Iberian lynx, even worse trying to make some even smaller prehistoric mammals. It goes long! Laughing

A baluchitherium would be a BIG model Roger, bigger than an average deinotherium, especially if Mojö would make it as bulky as his deinotherium. I must say I hope so, the "fitness style" indrico from COLLECTA is not really my cup of tea Laughing .
IMHO the problem is not only the size but also the prospects of sale. A baluchitherium is not a best seller as a Trex so I'm not sure a huge and expensive model would be a comfortable choice.
It would be great to know Egbert's point about this scratch

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

_________________
Christophe
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
baltimore zoo



Joined : 2010-06-30
Posts : 1639

PostSubject: Baltimore zoo   Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:36 am

James thanks so much for taking the time for your explanation. I have always wanted some "relative scale"(I never say scale, because as we have determined that would nearly impossible) newer toy lines like my Britians.

As I have mentioned before(Not sure if you saw my recent post) the popular Hasbro Star Wars line which has their individual figures(3 3/4" figures) selling for $5.99 to $8.99 and then two or three figure packs, larger vehicles/space ships and creatures for any where from $10.99 to $150.00. Even though it comes down to pricing, Hasbro has a lot of variety, and they offer the product and collectors/parents/kids buy it! So if you want to pay $150 for a larger item like the Millennium Falcon or an AT AT Walker you can or $25 for the Rancor you can! Don't think you would have to charge $150 dollars for a Deinotherium the size of a Safari WW Asian elephant, but $15-$20 wouldn't be unreasonable(I see how the the 2013 prehistoric mammals are in scale to each other).

Because I like to display my animals on the same shelf, I am really limited(Ex: I have my Papo tigers placed near my Safari WW Asian elephants(Different lines, but it works for me), although not perfect scale, but it looks way better than the Papo tigers next to the Papo Asian elephant) because I really hate the size differences.

Anyway, again, thanks for taking the time to explain, and perhaps think about how Hasbro pleases its fanbase by (Although not perfect scale), using some "relative scale" with their 3 3/4" figures as their focal point.
So if worried about safety regulations, make the big cats & great apes your "3 3/4" figures focal point" and make the antelopes, giraffes, zebras, hippos, rhinos, elephants off that scale (So if you did a savannah diorama all those would look descent together). And then for the smaller mammals (rabbits, weasels, otters etc.) go larger scale for child safety.
Back to top Go down
scot(t)



Country/State : USA
Age : 48
Joined : 2012-03-03
Posts : 2996

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:08 am

First off, welcome James! It's great to have you here (as yourself).

The question of scaling is interesting. All other things being equal, I'd love to see animals sculpted in relative scale. But other things aren't equal, and it seems the costs of pushing too hard for relative scale are too high. James' comments help clarify these costs.

I always thought I appreciated the fact that I was collecting children's toys. But the significance of this fact didn't fully sink in until we had the discussion about the upcoming 2013 Mojo Sloth. When some members complained about the position of the Sloth in the crook of two tree trunks, it was pointed out (by Roger, I believe, who was communicating the point from Mojo's James) that the sculptor wouldn't be able to represent the gorgeous sloth claws safely unless they were wrapped around the tree trunks.

I was already delighted by the pose (I was one of the people arguing in favor of it), but the realization that the tree trunks were needed to make those amazing claws safe really impressed upon me the limitations under which toy manufacturers are working.

Safety is one issue. Sales is also, of necessity, an issue. We're lucky to have companies like Mojo bringing us diverse and fascinating figures (like that awesome Sloth!), but it seems clear that if Mojo's giraffes and elephants cost $25-$30, you'd have a lot of parents who might have purchased a Mojo figure buying a Schleich, or Safari, or Papo instead. I just don't see how Mojo could possibly make relative scale a serious aim and at the same time flourish.

So, although I'd love to see more animals at relative scale, I'd rather see companies flourishing.

And I can hardly wait for that Sloth. Very Happy

Back to top Go down
STORMnl



Country/State : Nijmegen-Netherlands
Age : 56
Joined : 2011-07-24
Posts : 1080

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:17 am

Maybey when they make a baluchitherium,they can make it as a special production
smae they can do with the megatherium,,
like every year a special edition mammal Sad(o)):

wow now i have for 2 years olready a special edition Very Happy

with limited copies,,
ofcourse the collectors wil have first choice

Martien

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Roger
Admin


Country/State : Portugal
Joined : 2010-08-20
Posts : 20232

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:49 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

However, I'm also glad that you're introducing prehistoric mammals in 1:30 scale, contrary to Christophe I think it is not a huge problem to make a baluchitherium once in volume it is not much larger than a deinotherium. Worse is to make a smilodon apealing in 1:30 scale, something that would result smaller than the Iberian lynx, even worse trying to make some even smaller prehistoric mammals. It goes long! Laughing

A baluchitherium would be a BIG model Roger, bigger than an average deinotherium, especially if Mojö would make it as bulky as his deinotherium. I must say I hope so, the "fitness style" indrico from COLLECTA is not really my cup of tea Laughing .
IMHO the problem is not only the size but also the prospects of sale. A baluchitherium is not a best seller as a Trex so I'm not sure a huge and expensive model would be a comfortable choice.
It would be great to know Egbert's point about this scratch


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I continue thinking that who makes a deinotherium in 1:30 scale don't have any technical problem to make a baluchitherium in the same scale. Sales is another question. Of course it doesn't sell as much as a T-rex but probably it sells as much as some sauropods. As baluchitherium is larger in many aspects and only a little heavier than a large deinotherium, I believe it is not as bulky as a deino. Anyway, I agree with you and I would love best a paraceratherium bulky like a rhino than the half giraffe/horse interepretation of CollectA. It was surely a very massive creature although it is also very tall and long.
I like best th pose of this diagram than the giraffe pose. Very Happy

_________________
~ Rogério [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Kikimalou
Admin


Country/State : Lille, FRANCE
Age : 52
Joined : 2010-04-01
Posts : 15189

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:46 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
I continue thinking that who makes a deinotherium in 1:30 scale don't have any technical problem to make a baluchitherium in the same scale. Sales is another question. Of course it doesn't sell as much as a T-rex but probably it sells as much as some sauropods. As baluchitherium is larger in many aspects and only a little heavier than a large deinotherium, I believe it is not as bulky as a deino. Anyway, I agree with you and I would love best a paraceratherium bulky like a rhino than the half giraffe/horse interepretation of CollectA. It was surely a very massive creature although it is also very tall and long.
I like best th pose of this diagram than the giraffe pose. Very Happy

I don't say it is a technical problem, making a big sauropod is possible so there is no technical reason MOJÖ would be unable to make a Paraceratherium. I was talking about commercial reasons. This animal is believed to reach 4,5 or even 5,5 meters at shoulders. It means a 1:30 Indricotherium would be 15 or 18 cm at shoulder. For example, the 2012 COLLECTA giraffe is 18cm at the TOP of the head !

5,5m baluchitherium
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

4,5m baluchitherium
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I have a 1:40 Indricotherium model and it is already a massive guy Wink

_________________
Christophe
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
Roger
Admin


Country/State : Portugal
Joined : 2010-08-20
Posts : 20232

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:52 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
I continue thinking that who makes a deinotherium in 1:30 scale don't have any technical problem to make a baluchitherium in the same scale. Sales is another question. Of course it doesn't sell as much as a T-rex but probably it sells as much as some sauropods. As baluchitherium is larger in many aspects and only a little heavier than a large deinotherium, I believe it is not as bulky as a deino. Anyway, I agree with you and I would love best a paraceratherium bulky like a rhino than the half giraffe/horse interepretation of CollectA. It was surely a very massive creature although it is also very tall and long.
I like best th pose of this diagram than the giraffe pose. Very Happy

I don't say it is a technical problem, making a big sauropod is possible so there is no technical reason MOJÖ would be unable to make a Paraceratherium. I was talking about commercial reasons. This animal is believed to reach 4,5 or even 5,5 meters at shoulders. It means a 1:30 Indricotherium would be 15 or 18 cm at shoulder. For example, the 2012 COLLECTA giraffe is 18cm at the TOP of the head !

I have a 1:40 Indricotherium model and it is already a massive guy Wink

Very nice comparisons, thanks for showing! I don't have so extreme data about the size of a baluchitherium, 4,5 m at shoulder is closer from what I can find. Anyway, I'm not as documented with prehistoric life as you are.
Also, there is always the option of the brand choose a smaller species inside the genus what is not an excelent idea when the animal being represented is the largest known land mammal. :)

_________________
~ Rogério [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Egbert



Country/State : UK
Age : 48
Joined : 2011-03-13
Posts : 106

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:59 pm

Hi Everyone

This is a very nice discussion, its refreshing to hear the different thoughts and ideas pertaining to scale.

Balti's idea in respect to the Hasbro idea does have some merit and is worth considering however I am loathe to have models selling for US$100+, unless it was a 1:10 scale version of Crocobert, then we might make an exception Very Happy I think we might sell a few of those on STS!!! alien pirat
No seriously, the idea does make sense, thank you Balti, i am considering this.

Regarding the Baluchitherium, my view is that if we made this then it would have to be a 1:30 scale model, however as rightly pointed out by Kiki and Roger it would be very big. That said if the Prehistoric mammals prove popular then it would be such a shame if we didn't do a good representation of the largest known land mammal on both a size and quality level.
We cant keep everything to scale as i mentioned before but sometimes exceptions can be made.

Worse way it would make a very attractive door stop Laughing Laughing Laughing Just joking!

Many thanks everyone for your thoughts and ideas.

James
Back to top Go down
Kikimalou
Admin


Country/State : Lille, FRANCE
Age : 52
Joined : 2010-04-01
Posts : 15189

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:44 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Very nice comparisons, thanks for showing! I don't have so extreme data about the size of a baluchitherium, 4,5 m at shoulder is closer from what I can find. Anyway, I'm not as documented with prehistoric life as you are.
Also, there is always the option of the brand choose a smaller species inside the genus what is not an excelent idea when the animal being represented is the largest known land mammal. :)

Even at 4,5m at shoulders, it is huge. About the size, I agree a smaller specie would not be the best idea for showing the largest known land mammal. It's the same with all these blue whales smaller than the humpback whales Laughing Laughing Laughing

_________________
Christophe
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
Roger
Admin


Country/State : Portugal
Joined : 2010-08-20
Posts : 20232

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:45 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

Balti's idea in respect to the Hasbro idea does have some merit and is worth considering however I am loathe to have models selling for US$100+, unless it was a 1:10 scale version of Crocobert, then we might make an exception I think we might sell a few of those on STS!!!
James

Laughing pale Laughing
I'm sure the 1:10 Crocobert idea would be a colossal... flop! affraid
Also, the only extraterrestrial I know with almost the same proportions as me it is little Lionel Messi. I'm only slightly bulkier and of course much more talented playing football. Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Wink


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

It's the same with all these blue whales smaller than the humpback whales

That's a great point to explain why it is hard to work with animals in scale.
How many vintage 1:32 scale brands made a blue whale?
Even a pygmy blue whale would be huge in that scales.
Anyway it is not understandeable seeing them smaller than a humpback whale, I agree! Very Happy

_________________
~ Rogério [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Kikimalou
Admin


Country/State : Lille, FRANCE
Age : 52
Joined : 2010-04-01
Posts : 15189

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:22 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

It's the same with all these blue whales smaller than the humpback whales

That's a great point to explain why it is hard to work with animals in scale.
How many vintage 1:32 scale brands made a blue whale?
Even a pygmy blue whale would be huge in that scales.
Anyway it is not understandeable seeing them smaller than a humpback whale, I agree! Very Happy

It is indeed the problem when the most interesting characteristic of an animal is the gigantism Laughing

_________________
Christophe
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
ken yeo



Country/State : Singapore
Age : 46
Joined : 2010-04-05
Posts : 5376

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:14 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:

It's the same with all these blue whales smaller than the humpback whales

That's a great point to explain why it is hard to work with animals in scale.
How many vintage 1:32 scale brands made a blue whale?
Even a pygmy blue whale would be huge in that scales.
Anyway it is not understandeable seeing them smaller than a humpback whale, I agree! Very Happy

It is indeed the problem when the most interesting characteristic of an animal is the gigantism Laughing

Laughing Laughing

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
http://www.collectorsquest.com/collector/ken-yeo
baltimore zoo



Joined : 2010-06-30
Posts : 1639

PostSubject: Baltimore zoo   Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:39 am

Thanks for considering my idea, based upon the success of the Hasbro Star Wars line.
So I think a good compromise would be to have: Elephants(since the largest figure) the size of the Safari WW size and sell for that $20 range, and then have the rest of the "larger mammals" (Big cats, antelope, rhinos, hippos, giraffes, great apes, ostriches etc. sell for $15 - $6 range) be to "relative scale" to those elephants.
*That way if you did a savannah diorama at least you would have a "majority" of the animals look descent together.
Then for example do small mammals(Monkeys, meerkats, armadillos, otters, koalas etc.) be to a "larger scale" for safety regulations.

I think it's a good compromise.
Back to top Go down
Ana



Country/State : come from Poland now live in The Netherlands
Age : 29
Joined : 2010-04-01
Posts : 9251

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:45 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Thanks for considering my idea, based upon the success of the Hasbro Star Wars line.
So I think a good compromise would be to have: Elephants(since the largest figure) the size of the Safari WW size and sell for that $20 range, (...)

I would like to see Mojo elephants in scale as big as WW ones (1:20-1:18), I'm sure it would be lovely! Very Happy

_________________
Anna
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
http://www.horseandbird.com
SyLoBe



Country/State : Spain
Age : 29
Joined : 2010-12-13
Posts : 2714

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:46 pm

Welcome James!

I found really interesting what you said about scales. It´s something I´ve been thinking about for a long time, and that was my conclussion so I´m happy I was correct at least in part. I can perfectly understand the reasons of each figurine size.

Thank you!

_________________
Visit my collection gallery at [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Visit my art gallery at [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I accept commissions!
Back to top Go down
http://sylobe.deviantart.com
baltimore zoo



Joined : 2010-06-30
Posts : 1639

PostSubject: Baltimore zoo   Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:13 am

Forgot to say, since you would loathe having to pay over $100(Like I said the most expensive figure would be in that affordable $25 range), but perhaps charging $50-$100 for a playset of some sort to display the animals. Like an Arctic set for the polars, or a Kopje for an African animals etc..
Back to top Go down
Mark1



Country/State : USA New Jersey
Age : 57
Joined : 2011-11-04
Posts : 9

PostSubject: A manufacturers view on scaling   Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:01 pm

I do have a question... First, I am glad the topic of scaling came up. I understand about not having the animal figures small so that children can choke on them, but.... how does a company that puts out "toobs" and "minis" get away with releasing small figures? If they can make minis and smaller animals for toobs... why can't the scale of animal figures be consistent? :}
Back to top Go down
baltimore zoo



Joined : 2010-06-30
Posts : 1639

PostSubject: Baltimore zoo   Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:49 am

Great point Mark1 ! If they can make toob size animal figures, then they should be able to do an entire line of "relative scale".
Back to top Go down
Mark1



Country/State : USA New Jersey
Age : 57
Joined : 2011-11-04
Posts : 9

PostSubject: A manufacturers view on scaling   Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:17 am

Exactly! Thank you! Now..... which company will be brave enough to start such an enterprise...................???
Back to top Go down
SUSANNE
Admin


Country/State : Denmark, the peninsula of Djursland.
Age : 64
Joined : 2010-09-30
Posts : 28209

PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:26 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Exactly! Thank you! Now..... which company will be brave enough to start such an enterprise...................???

Noah`s Pals did, - but they were sold and shut down Sad

_________________
SUSANNE  [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
http://dyr-og-dimser.dk
Mark1



Country/State : USA New Jersey
Age : 57
Joined : 2011-11-04
Posts : 9

PostSubject: A manufacturers view on scaling   Sat Dec 15, 2012 11:44 pm

That neat and sad at the same time... I checked my source that I usually buy from and they have Noah's Pals... all in 1:24 scale. Go to tgftoys.com
Back to top Go down
baltimore zoo



Joined : 2010-06-30
Posts : 1639

PostSubject: Baltimore zoo   Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:49 am

Yes, Noah Pal's did to relative scale, but they weren't the best quality of figure line.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: A manufacturers view on scaling   Today at 1:17 am

Back to top Go down
 
A manufacturers view on scaling
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 2 of 3Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Similar topics
-
» A manufacturers view on scaling
» Has Your World View Changed?
» What's your view on School Uniforms?
» Near/far view discussion
» A View to a Kill (1985)

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
STS Forum  :: Animal toy figures reviews and discussions :: General reviews and discussions-
Jump to: