Dimorphodon and Concavenator, 2013 Safari Ltd Prehistoric series

Already the first time I saw pictures of these two models, I liked them very much.
But gosh! I have to stop somewhere, and I HAVE decided to concentrate on the prehistoric models from Starlux this year.
Well, my willpower is as strong as an over-boiled spagetti, so, YESS!!! Now they are here

Westy proudly presents : The new Dimorphodon from the Wild Safari-series, and the Concavenator from the Carnegie-series
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

The Dimorphodon ("Two types of teeth") lived 180-154 million years ago in the mid-Jurassic time.
He was a flying reptile with a wingspan of app 1,5 meters, and probably mainly ate fish.[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


The paintwork of the concavenator is quite different from the picture in the catalogue !
I think he is much more pretty ”in real” :-D

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

The concavenator ( hump backed hunter” ) lived about 130 million years ago.
He was app 6 meters long, with a funny ”hump” on his back.
Fossiles suggest that he had scales or feathers on the arms, and perhaps some sort of spikes on the back, but this model doesn`t show it.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Splendid dinos Susanne. My favorite is the concavenator.

Very good Safari figures, Susanne.

Dimorphodon:this reptile flying cause panic.

Concavenator:is very rare prehistoric.

Thank you for showing these new SAFARI Ltd Susanne.

The dimorphodon was already on my wish list and your pics are increasing my desire

The concavenator is nice of course but it looks so much like the Carnegie Giganotosaurus... It seems all the new  Carnegie theropods are clones... Too bad. Nevertheless, thank you for the good pics .

Congrats Susanne, very nice new figurines

Congrats Susanne, very nice additions! 
I like very much the Dimorphodon!

Wow! I love them both! Great pictures Susanne. Thank you!

Thankyou, dear friends

Kikimalou wrote:

The concavenator is nice of course but it looks so much like the Carnegie Giganotosaurus... It seems all the new  Carnegie theropods are clones... Too bad.

You are right !
Perhaps the did look somewhat alike, but they weren`t static. Their designer could need a bit more imagination .

Congrats Susanne! I like it too!

congrats

Great acqusitions,Susanne  Btw,would you recommend the Concavenator?And,please could you post a comparision pic,with another Carnegie dino,preferably Giganotosaurus and Cryolophosaurus?Thanks so much:)

Juan Andrés wrote:

Great acqusitions,Susanne  Btw,would you recommend the Concavenator?And,please could you post a comparision pic,with another Carnegie dino,preferably Giganotosaurus and Cryolophosaurus?Thanks so much:)

Sorry, I only have very few Safari dinoes. I hope this will do ?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Two unlikely friends in beautyful summer morning sun   

SUSANNE wrote:

Juan Andrés wrote:

Great acqusitions,Susanne  Btw,would you recommend the Concavenator?And,please could you post a comparision pic,with another Carnegie dino,preferably Giganotosaurus and Cryolophosaurus?Thanks so much:)

Sorry, I only have very few Safari dinoes. I hope this will do ?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Two unlikely friends in beautyful summer morning sun   

 Well,I don't have the Corytho,but I could make an idea myself.Thanks so much for posting this pic for me;I like the Concavenator and I'd like to purchase it eventually,Thanks:D

Thanks for showing these great photos!

The two figures are really nice but it's damage for the painting of the concavenator because it's not as in the picture. However, congrats.

I am glad this topic is back! I like the dimorphodon but maybe not as much as CollectA deinocheirus, though, I think I like best this concavenator than the CollectA counterpart. The figure as a beautiful pose although too similar with the giganatosaurus as Kiki noted. :)
Only the tip of the tail, pointing downwards to help balancing the figure, doesn't look to match all the movement we can see in it.
Many prehistoric animals were only found after Starlux stoping their production, so it is a good excuse to collect figures that you cannot find on Starlux collection.

Interesting figures, so many different dinosaurs and prehistoric life out there these days

Thankyou, friends  

Neven Florian wrote:

The two figures are really nice but it's damage for the painting of the concavenator because it's not as in the picture. However, congrats.

Actually I think the model is nicer than the catalogue