Which non-Safari tiger cubs are the most similar to the Safari tiger cubs 294929 and 295029?

Hello everybody,

I have a Safari Bengal tiger cub 294929
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
and a Safari white Bengal tiger cub 295029
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
I’d like to buy some other tiger cubs models of similar size and sculptural style (compared to other models, these Safari tiger cubs seem chubbier). I’ve looked at a number of photos in the Toy Animal Wiki and online, but the size is not always clearly discernible from the pictures. Could someone please advise which models (preferably in production) would be most suitable?
Many thanks in advance!

I'm sorry Martin, I'm not too much on cubs and I can't help.

I also don't collect tiger babies, that's the sort of question which Susanne could be the perfect person to answer but unfortunately she is not very active on forum these days. I don't know if Paige can help?
Just watching pictures, none of the tiger cubs of the other brands have a similar style to these. Maybe the pair of cubs of AAA 55003SIT and 55003STA have a compatible style but I have no idea if the size is similar.

I don't think there really are any, AAA cubs are probably the closest fit to what you are looking for, but their paint work varies a lot and they are a big bigger than the Safari cubs...

My collection is currently packed up because I just moved, but you can see my tigers in photos on my website:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Let me know if I can assist any further!

Many thanks for your advice, Kikimalou, Roger, and especially Paige.
Paige, I have seen your tigers on your website and also the topic from you A whole flock of Safari Tigers- new and old (walkarounds and comparisons) (forumieren.de).
It seems to me that in terms of size (and probably after repainting), the Schleich 14092 tiger kitten (https://toyanimalwiki.mywikis.wiki/wiki/Schleich_14092_Tiger_Kitten) and Schleich 14187 tiger cub standing (https://toyanimalwiki.mywikis.wiki/wiki/Schleich_14187_Tiger_Cub_Standing), or even the Eikoh tiger kitten (https://toyanimalwiki.mywikis.wiki/wiki/Eikoh_Tiger_Kitten) might be a good fit for my Safari tiger cubs. Would any of these models be more suitable than the AAA tiger cubs? If you had your collection unpacked and could find a little time, I would be grateful for comparative photos, but I would not want to trouble you.
Once again, heartfelt thanks for your kindness!

I have 3 safari tiger cubs and they're larger than Papo/Schleich's newer cubs.

I have Schleich's older white tiger cub though (Schleich 14353 Tiger Cub White) and that one is pretty much the same size if I recall correctly.

I'm not with my collection right now but if in a week you still want photos I can take some group pictures

Joliezac wrote:

I have 3 safari tiger cubs and they're larger than Papo/Schleich's newer cubs.

I have Schleich's older white tiger cub though (Schleich 14353 Tiger Cub White) and that one is pretty much the same size if I recall correctly.

I'm not with my collection right now but if in a week you still want photos I can take some group pictures

Thank you very much, Jolie. I would be grateful for any comparison photos.

I agree with Jolie. I am happy to take comparisons but like I said, everything is packed up currently. When I do get access to them I will check here to see if photos are still needed. :)

Thanks!

Ok here are the comparisons,

These are my 3 Safari tiger cubs with Schleich's older 2005 cub 14353. I think that this fits the best with Safari's when compared to Papo/newer Schleich. I don't own any tiger cubs from CollectA, Mojo or less known brands.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Here with the new Schleich and Papo, as you can see they are noticeably smaller

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Thank you for the comparison photos. They were incredibly helpful in making my decision, and it seems that the older Schleich tiger figures will be the best fit for me.