Trying to find pictures of these 24 assorted small Nayab wild animals

I'm opening this topic to ask for pictures of these very small  Nayab animals. These figures are not easy to tell from the slightly larger ones but I believe we will be able of completing this set on TAW.
10 of them are already listed on TAW  if I got it correctly. This is set [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] of 24 assorted figures measuring 1 to 2 inches.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I have the maned wolf, how to send the picture please?  

Caracal wrote:

I have the mane wolf, how to send the picture please?  

Alain, you can post the picture here but if you prefer to e-mail me, it is fine too.

I think I bought this set a while ago (minus the aye aye) but its in storage. When I get to it, I will try to remember to photograph it for the wiki.

Here is the armadillo and the Giant anteater
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

And the pangolin!
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I wonder how do you tell the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] set versions from the slightly larger [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]. Differences are quite subtle sometimes.
Though, I'm convinced you're not cheating me. I added armadillo, anteater, pangolin and maned wolf. Now we have 14 of 24. Let's hope we complete this set to work another set soon.
thanks Taylor and Alain, Taylor, don't you have the hollow extralarge version of the anteater, it is also missing as well as the aardvark.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Saarlooswolfhound wrote:

I think I bought this set a while ago (minus the aye aye) but its in storage. When I get to it, I will try to remember to photograph it for the wiki.

Great Paige, I remember seeing them together with the slightly larger ones and a few others on your topic.Maybe we can list later the set with the mini lion and other common species which is not as popular as these ones.

Roger,I don't have the large anteater but have another small anteater which may belong to the other set you mentioned.

I have some of the item 167 too.. :)

Taos wrote:

Roger,I don't have the large anteater but have another small anteater which may belong to the other set you mentioned.

Caracal wrote:

I have some of the item 167 too.. :)

The set [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] is completely listed on TAW
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
I believe it is correct but, if you find any mistake, please let me know.
Taylor, is the anteater of this link you have? It is slightly larger than the one you posted here, right?

Thanks Fernando, STS team is doing a great job, I added capybara, red panda, beaver, raccoon and platypus.
Now we have 19 of 24 listed.
Comparing to the Extralarge set, we're theorically missing:
Aardvark (top left)
Badger (top right)
Otter (bottom left)
Rabbit (left most)
Tapir (Where?)

I can't find a tapir in this picture but it can be seen in the other catalogue picture I posted above, it is the left bottom of [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
It's a little mistery too difficult for a blind croc, could you help me identifying the right most figure?
Also, is it a lighter version of the mongoose just below the badger or have I entered the wrong mongoose on TAW ?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Right after reading this page, I found this listing...
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
There's the tapir

pipsxlch wrote:

Right after reading this page, I found this listing...
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
There's the tapir

Interesting listing, Kelly.
It mixes figures from different Nayab sets. That's quite normal, each brand defines their own assortment. So, to avoid confusing Wiki pages, we try to follow the assortments as they are presented on Nayab's website. What's funny is that I don't find the tapir in one of the Nayab pictures but it is clearly visible in the other page picture and I would love to know which figure is replacing the tapir.

By the way, couldn't it be a mistake. Aren't these two the same red panda figure and they forgot to include the tapir?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

That does indeed look like the case. Those are the same red panda figures. So maybe they misplaced the tapir and just grabbed a very vaguely similar figure for the photo. After all, it was never intended to be scrutinized by amateur naturalists.

pipsxlch wrote:

That does indeed look like the case. Those are the same red panda figures. So maybe they misplaced the tapir and just grabbed a very vaguely similar figure for the photo. After all, it was never intended to be scrutinized by amateur naturalists.

Thanks Kelly! That's the vaguest use of the vaguely word I've ever read.

I have this rabbit
not sure if it is the small one though? it has quite dense rubbery plastic

oh yes, it definitely looks like the small one, compared to this - [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Annette, I think it is the right one, it is hard to see but you can see it on catalogue picture below.
Material uses to be pvc, slightly less dense than the major brand figures but I think the material depends from each brand specifications.
Do you have the hollow giant one too?
Oh, vertical pictures are not very practical for TAW but I will use them anyway.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

thank you Roger, glad to help. I think it looks the same as the picture above, quite small and compact and the red eye is the same.
I don't have the bigger one.
Yes you are right about the material, softer and less dense.
It's hard to take photos to show the size, even the vertical ones change shape, but just leave it out if it's too strange to put in haha
I don't have any lego blocks ha ha, never ever played with lego. I will try and work out something different to show the scale

sunny wrote:

thank you Roger, glad to help. I think it looks the same as the picture above, quite small and compact and the red eye is the same.
I don't have the bigger one.
Yes you are right about the material, softer and less dense.
It's hard to take photos to show the size, even the vertical ones change shape, but just leave it out if it's too strange to put in haha
I don't have any lego blocks ha ha, never ever played with lego. I will try and work out something different to show the scale

That's fine, I cropped and if I want to show the size I have that picture with a scale. I have so many white Lego blocks.
I'm supercurious to know what is marked on the extralarge rabbit, Nayab sometimes is funny and it will influence the species identifications for all the smaller Nayab rabbits.
I'm happy that people is providing pictures in such a short time. It is almost complete now, only 4 missing.
Aardvark, badger, otter and tapir.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Hello,
I looked at my 2 sets of Nayab no. 167 and I see that they not equal.
See here what Nayab no. 167 must be.
I will show you next what my other Nayab no. 167 contains.
Benno.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.].
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.].
I think these 6 animals were part of the second set.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.].
In these shop you can get the Nayab set 167 in Germany

Great picture Benno and you sorted the figures exactly as they are on TAW.
As far as I can see and not considering painting variations, the assortment is the same we see on TAW and catalogue picture.
I'm curious to see your other version of the same set.
By the way, this is still the nicest Nayab set in my opinion. These figures were inexpensive gold when the species diversity wasn't as rich as it is these days.

I will get a comparison picture of the Giant anteaters and I have the large hollow rabbit.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Thanks Taylor, this is really the large hollow rabbit which is already on TAW, I'll use your picture anyway.
We're missing the Extralarge one that you can see on picture below and we also miss the other outlined figures.
Atention, this is the catalogue picture of the set of Extralarge figures, not exactly the little models being the subject of this topic.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]